The
Tongue Test
by Roy Lawrence
Which
part of the human body do you think has the capacity to be most
dangerous? Perhaps the fist, because it can knock another person
senseless with a well directed punch? Or the foot, because it can
put the boot into a victim who is on the ground after being
attacked? Or the fingers, which can strangle the life out of
someone? Or some other part?
If we were to ask
St James this question he would not give any of these answers. He
would pick a part of the body which seems smaller and weaker than
any of them. His answer would be the tongue. ‘An
untamed tongue,’ he says can be ‘a world of evil among the parts of
the body’ (James 3:6) and ‘full of deadly poison’ (James
3:7). Even though we may consider ourselves serious churchgoers,
St James says, ‘If anyone considers himself religious and does not
keep a tight rein on his tongue, he deceives himself and his
religion is worthless’ (James 1:26). An uncontrolled tongue,
he says, can be as dangerous as a firebomb in the hands of an
arsonist. ‘It sets the whole course of his life on fire and is
itself set on fire by hell’ (James 3:6).
Do you think this
is rather over the top? Do you prefer the view expressed by the
children’s rhyme – ‘Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words
will never hurt me’? I used to quote it myself when I was at junior
school if anyone called me names. However, even as I said the words,
I think I knew they were not true. For words can be deeply hurtful
both when we are children and, indeed, throughout the whole of life.
If
I were to choose my own picture language to describe a malevolent
and misdirected tongue, I might not speak – like St James – in terms
of fire or poison. I think of the tongue as a sharp and deadly
knife. For with the tongue we can stab another human being either
through the heart or in the back.
My guess is that,
if you think back, you will probably be able to remember an occasion
when you have been really hurt by something somebody said to you.
Perhaps it happened a long time ago and that person was one of your
parents, or a teacher, or another pupil at your school. Perhaps more
recently you can think of hurtful words spoken by a colleague at
work or by a so-called friend.
Cut and thrust
There are many
ways of verbal heart-stabbing. Some people seem to derive an
unpleasant pleasure out of name-calling. ‘You skinny little runt,’
they say, or ‘you great fat slob,’ ‘you brainless idiot,’ ‘you’re a
nobody,’ ‘you’re a waste of space,’ and so on. Also there is no
shortage of cheap jeering jokes directed against insecure and
vulnerable minorities, based perhaps on racist humour, or sexist
humour, or mockery of the disabled – all straight out of the devil’s
joke book.
Or, in complete
contrast, there is dishonest flattery. We love it at the time, but
we shouldn’t, because if someone builds us up falsely, life will
inevitably knock us down afterwards. So flattery is a form of
heart-stabbing.
Actually, you
don’t have to tell a lie in order to be a heart-stabber. What about
the person who speaks the truth, but does so malevolently? There is
a prayer of self-examination and confession which I sometimes use
and which I often commend if I am conducting a school of prayer. I
came across it many years ago, but have never been able to discover
its author. It contains the telling sentence: ‘Deliver me and keep
me, O my Lord, from the dishonest honesty of frankness meant to
hurt!’
If we turn from
words that stab you in the heart to those who stab you in the back,
we find that this is something which the Bible takes very seriously
indeed. Verbal back-stabbing is specifically targeted by the ninth
commandment which forbids us to tell lies about people behind their
backs when it says, ‘Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy
neighbour’. Other commandments are also relevant to it. When the
sixth commandment says, ‘Thou shalt not kill’, this could well
forbid character assassination too and the eighth commandment, ‘Thou
shalt no steal’, certainly includes the theft of somebody else’s
reputation.
It is so easy to
stab others in the back. You don’t have to tell a lie or even a
harmful half-truth. The back-stabbing can just be a bit of spicy
gossip. Church circles are far from immune to it. We have our own
phraseology when we do it: ‘There probably isn’t anything in it, but
have you heard what people are saying?’ ‘There is a disturbing
rumour I ought to share with you – just for your prayers, of
course!’
Sometimes the
tongue can serve not so much as a knife, but more as a ‘slime
applicator’. There’s a lot of this around in society today. I used
to be the Radio and T.V. Officer for my diocese and year after year
I used to grieve over much of what I watched and heard. My guess is
that with a very little thought you will be able to call to mind an
occasion when you have felt ‘slimed’ after hearing
what someone has said on the T.V. or watching a play or film in
which wholesome values are belittled and those who believe in them
are ridiculed.
However, none of
these things have to be this way. Even St James – for all his
misgivings about the ways in which we use our tongues – knows that
it is possible to use them for God’s purpose too. He says that if
you picture the tongue as a fountain, though the liquid that comes
from it can be foul and poisonous, it can also flow with good,
fresh, living water. It can be a source of blessing rather than
cursing (James 3:10).
Passing the tongue test
So how about you
and me? Do we pass the tongue test or fail it?
To find out the
answer, review in your mind a selection of the things you have said
in the last seven days. Then ask yourself – would Jesus have said
them? Or, to put it another way, could you have said them to Jesus,
or in the presence of Jesus? Alternatively, have you found yourself
listening willingly to things that were incompatible with the
presence of Jesus?
I
wonder if you have heard of a remarkable woman called Hannah Moore.
She lived 200 years ago and was a committed Christian noted for good
deeds. She was a writer of some repute and an effective communicator
of the Christian faith. Not only was she no gossip herself, but she
was quite famous for refusing to listen to anyone else who was
gossiping. If anyone tried to pass on gossip in her presence, she
would nip the whole process in the bud by saying, ‘Come, we will go
and see if this is true,’ and she would lead the red-faced
gossip-monger straight to the person who was being talked about. It
was not surprising that people learned to curb their tongues when
they were in her presence.
Hannah would have
passed the tongue test with flying colours. I hope you and I would
do so too. What do you think?
Keep me, O Lord,
from the trivial,
the interfering and the stupid;
from the infection
of irritation and anger over nothings.
Deliver me and
keep me, O my Lord,
from all
promptings to decry the person or work of others; from scorn,
sarcasm, petty spite and whisperings behind the back; from the
dishonest honesty of frankness meant to hurt.
Deliver me and
keep me, O my Lord,
from hasty
judgments, biased judgments, cruel judgments, and all pleasure in
them;
from resentment
over disapproval or reproof, whether just or unjust.
Deliver me and
keep me, O my Lord,
from all
imposition of my own fads or idiosyncrasies upon others;
from
self-justification, self-excusing and complacency,
Deliver me and
keep me, O Lord. In your name I ask it. Amen.
Anon
This article first
appeared in the UK Plain Truth of March/April 2003 and was used with
permission.